How to write a discussion section?
Generally, the Discussion section does not need to include any numbers. No statistics need to be repeated from the results, nor does the discussion need to refer to table numbers. Instead, simply explain the results in language that is easy for a non-researcher to understand.In general, the discussion section should show you thinking about your data and what your data mean for your purpose in doing the research and the questions or hypotheses you were exploring or testing.Conclusion: Know the Difference Before Drafting Manuscripts Last updated Jun 14, 2019 7 The discussion section of your manuscript can be one of the hardest to write as it requires you to think about the meaning of the research you have done.
This is accomplished with a general review of the primary research literature (with citations) but should not include very specific, lengthy explanations that you will probably discuss in greater detail later in the Discussion. The judgment of what is general or specific is difficult at first, but with practice and reading of the scientific.However, if you are inexperienced writing research papers, consider creating two distinct sections for each element in your paper as a way to better organize your thoughts and, by extension, your paper. Think of the results section as the place where you report what your study found; think of the discussion section as the place where you.
Aside from who to include in your Acknowledgments section, it should also be sated that titles such as Mr, Mrs, Miss etc are not commonly included, but honorary titles such as Dr, Professor etc. are. The institutions of the acknowledged people are usually mentioned.
